How New Tax Regulations Are Reshaping Bank Lending and Investment Strategy

How New Tax Regulations Are Reshaping Bank Lending and Investment Strategy

The banking industry is entering a period of significant transformation as sweeping federal tax changes begin influencing how financial institutions approach lending, investments, and client advisory services. These developments are about more than compliance. They are reshaping the economics behind commercial lending decisions, altering investment strategies, and creating new opportunities for banks to add value for their customers.

For financial institutions that can quickly assess and respond to these changes, the potential benefits extend well beyond the tax department. Institutions that understand the practical implications of new legislation will be better positioned to strengthen client relationships, identify growth opportunities, and navigate an increasingly complex regulatory environment.

Today’s banking tax professionals are working through a landscape that continues to evolve. Federal reforms are intersecting with changing state requirements, while audit expectations remain high. As a result, tax considerations are becoming more closely tied to broader business decisions, influencing everything from loan underwriting and portfolio strategy to capital allocation and long-term planning.

The Qualified Business Income Deduction and Commercial Lending

Among the most significant developments is the permanent extension of the Section 199A (§199A) qualified business income deduction, which preserves a deduction for eligible noncorporate taxpayers, including many owners of pass-through businesses. The basic deduction remains 20%, subject to income, wage, property, and specified-service-business limitations.

For banks, this change may meaningfully affect how commercial borrowers are evaluated. Reduced tax liabilities can improve after-tax cash flow and increase a borrower’s capacity to reinvest in operations, pursue growth opportunities, and service debt. As these benefits become more widespread, financial institutions may find it necessary to revisit assumptions that were developed under previous tax law.

The impact extends beyond underwriting considerations. Many business owners are also evaluating entity structures, compensation strategies, and investment timing to maximize available tax benefits. As a result, banks have an opportunity to deepen relationships by helping clients understand how tax changes may influence broader financial decisions.

New Opportunities in Agricultural and Rural Lending

Federal legislation has also introduced lender interest exclusions for qualifying rural and agricultural real estate loans, creating a potentially attractive incentive for financial institutions serving these markets. New Section 139L (§139L) allows qualified lenders, including FDIC-insured banks and savings associations, to exclude 25% of qualifying interest income from certain post-enactment loans secured by rural or agricultural real property.

As the after-tax economics of these loans improve, some banks may find opportunities to expand agricultural lending portfolios or strengthen their presence in rural communities. However, realizing these benefits requires thoughtful implementation.

Institutions should carefully evaluate the tax accounting, reporting, and documentation requirements associated with these provisions. Close coordination among lending, accounting, and tax teams will be essential to ensure compliance and support positions during future examinations.

Affordable Housing Tax Credits Gain Momentum

Recent changes to the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program are also creating new considerations for financial institutions.

Enhanced tax credit benefits are improving the financial profile of many affordable housing projects, making certain investments more attractive than they may have been under prior rules. For banks involved in community development initiatives, these changes may present opportunities to revisit investment strategies and evaluate projects that previously offered limited returns.

As affordable housing investments become increasingly competitive, institutions may need to reassess portfolio concentrations, underwriting assumptions, and long-term valuation models. Tax considerations will play an important role in determining the overall profitability and strategic fit of these investments.

Business Interest Deduction Changes May Influence Borrower Behavior

Modifications to business interest deduction limitations are similarly reshaping the financing landscape for many commercial borrowers. The Section 163(j) (§163(j)) can increase interest-deduction capacity for borrowers subject to the business-interest limitation by restoring the depreciation, amortization, and depletion addback in adjusted taxable income. That can reduce after-tax borrowing costs for affected borrowers.

By reducing the after-tax cost of debt, these changes may encourage businesses to pursue expansion projects, refinance existing obligations, or adjust capital structures. Increased borrowing activity could create new lending opportunities for financial institutions while also changing how borrower risk profiles are evaluated.

For banks, understanding the relationship between tax policy and capital structure decisions will become increasingly important. Credit analysis may require a more nuanced assessment of how borrowers are likely to respond to the evolving tax environment and how those decisions affect long-term financial performance.

Turning Regulatory Change into Strategic Opportunity

While each of these provisions presents unique considerations, they share a common theme: tax policy is becoming more closely connected to business strategy.

Financial institutions that view these developments solely through a compliance lens may overlook opportunities to enhance lending programs, strengthen investment performance, and provide greater value to clients. Conversely, banks that combine technical tax knowledge with strategic planning will be better positioned to adapt to changing market conditions and capitalize on emerging opportunities.

Success in this environment requires more than monitoring legislative developments. It requires the ability to evaluate how regulatory changes affect both the institution and its customers and to implement practical strategies with confidence.

How HTB Can Help

At HTB, we work with financial institutions to navigate complex tax and regulatory developments that affect lending strategies, investment decisions, financial reporting, and client advisory services.

Our team helps banks evaluate the practical implications of new legislation, implement tax-efficient strategies, and maintain positions that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. By combining technical tax knowledge with practical industry insight, we help financial institutions make informed decisions in an increasingly complex environment.

Contact HTB

/by

Fraud Prevention in the Digital Age: Addressing Emerging Risks and Technologies

Fraud Prevention in the Digital Age: Addressing Emerging Risks and Technologies

Every organization faces fraud risk. Historically, prevention efforts focused on risks originating within the organization, such as asset misappropriation, expense reimbursement schemes, procurement fraud, and financial reporting misconduct. While these risks remain relevant, organizations are increasingly confronting fraud threats driven by advances in technology and a rapidly changing digital environment.

As fraud risks evolve, prevention strategies need to evolve with them. Organizations that rely exclusively on traditional approaches may find themselves less prepared for threats that can originate outside the organization and be carried out with a level of speed and sophistication that was difficult to imagine even a few years ago.

Understanding the Limits of Traditional Fraud Frameworks

For decades, the fraud triangle has served as a foundational model for understanding fraudulent behavior. The framework identifies three conditions that contribute to fraud: opportunity, pressure, and rationalization.

This model continues to provide valuable insight, particularly when evaluating occupational fraud risk. Many long-standing fraud prevention measures were designed around these concepts. Segregation of duties, access restrictions, and management oversight remain important safeguards. Together, these measures help limit opportunities for misconduct and reinforce accountability throughout the organization.

However, many of today’s fraud risks do not fit neatly within the traditional fraud triangle. Cybercriminals, organized fraud networks, and other external threat actors often operate independently of the motivations commonly associated with employee misconduct. Their goals may range from stealing funds or sensitive information to disrupting operations or demanding ransom payments. Unlike traditional occupational fraud, these threats can originate anywhere and target organizations of any size.

As a result, organizations should view traditional fraud frameworks as an important foundation rather than a complete solution.

Artificial Intelligence Is Reshaping Fraud Risk

Artificial intelligence has significantly changed both the scale and sophistication of fraudulent activity.

Fraudsters can now use AI to create convincing documents, impersonate individuals through voice-cloning technology, and generate realistic video content. Tools that once required specialized expertise are becoming increasingly accessible, making sophisticated fraud schemes easier to execute.

These capabilities can support a wide range of schemes, from fraudulent payment requests to business email compromise attacks. In some cases, fraudsters use AI-generated content to establish credibility and persuade employees to bypass established procedures.

The challenge for organizations is that many traditional verification practices rely on familiarity and trust. Employees may recognize a voice, an email address, or a face on a video call and assume the communication is legitimate. As AI-generated content becomes more convincing, organizations may need to strengthen independent verification procedures and reevaluate approval processes that rely heavily on perceived authority.

Moving Beyond a Reactive Approach

Many organizations strengthen fraud prevention efforts only after experiencing a loss. While investigations and corrective actions are important, they take place after financial damage has already occurred.

An effective fraud prevention strategy is proactive rather than reactive. This requires organizations to routinely revisit their risk profile and determine whether existing controls remain effective as operations, technology, and business processes change.

Fraud prevention should be viewed as an ongoing business process rather than a one-time compliance exercise. As organizations grow and adopt new technologies, new vulnerabilities can emerge. Regular risk assessments help ensure prevention efforts remain aligned with current threats.

Building a More Comprehensive Prevention Strategy

Effective fraud prevention depends on more than strong policies. Organizations also need visibility into emerging risks and the ability to adapt as threats evolve.

Traditional safeguards remain essential. Management oversight, vendor due diligence, employee training, and periodic access reviews continue to play an important role in reducing fraud risk. These controls provide a strong foundation for addressing many common schemes.

At the same time, organizations should consider whether their prevention strategies adequately address technology-driven threats. Multi-factor authentication, data encryption, cybersecurity assessments, and continuous monitoring can strengthen defenses against external fraud attempts.

Many organizations are also leveraging data analytics to identify unusual transactions, unexpected payment activity, or other anomalies that warrant further review. These tools can help organizations identify potential issues earlier and respond before losses escalate.

Perhaps most importantly, fraud prevention programs should remain flexible. Risks continue to change, and controls that were effective several years ago may not provide the same level of protection today.

The Continuing Importance of People and Culture

While technology continues to transform fraud risk, people remain one of the most important elements of any prevention strategy.

Leadership sets the tone for how risk and integrity are viewed throughout the organization. When management consistently reinforces expectations and responds appropriately to concerns, employees are more likely to recognize red flags and report suspicious activity.

Organizations should also encourage open communication and provide clear reporting channels for concerns. A strong culture of integrity can help reduce opportunities for misconduct while supporting the early identification of potential issues.

Internal audit, compliance, and risk management functions can further strengthen these efforts by evaluating existing controls and helping organizations address new and emerging risks. Their role extends beyond compliance and can provide valuable insight into whether prevention strategies remain effective as the business evolves.

Looking Ahead

Fraud risk continues to evolve alongside technology and changing business practices. While traditional fraud prevention frameworks remain valuable, organizations should regularly evaluate whether their strategies address the risks they face today rather than the risks they faced in the past.

Organizations that regularly reassess fraud risks and adapt their prevention strategies will be better positioned to protect assets, respond to emerging threats, and maintain stakeholder confidence. In today’s environment, fraud prevention is not simply a matter of compliance. It is an important component of risk management, operational resilience, and long-term organizational success.

At HTB, we help organizations evaluate risk, strengthen governance practices, and navigate complex business challenges with confidence. Contact us to learn how our team can help your organization address risk and make informed decisions in a changing environment.

Contact HTB

 

 

/by

HTB Professionals Recognized by LCPA for Leadership and Professional Excellence

,

HTB Chief Operating Officer Claire Harrell has been honored as one of Baton Rouge Business Report’s 2025 Forty Under 40, recognizing her leadership and impact on both our industry and community.

Read more
/by

Hannis T. Bourgeois Opens The 1924 Fund Grant Applications to Louisiana Nonprofits

, ,

The 1924 Fund is now open to nonprofits serving Louisiana communities that are making a difference in education, culture, and family wellness. Apply by September 30.

Read more
/by

Why Your Construction Tax Strategy Should Evolve With Every Project

Why Your Construction Tax Strategy Should Evolve With Every Project

No two construction projects are exactly alike. Every job has its own timeline, contract structure, payment schedule, and profitability profile. Yet many contractors approach tax planning the same way year after year, revisiting it only when it’s time to file a return.

In an industry where cash flow drives decision-making and profit margins can be tight, a static tax strategy can leave valuable opportunities unexplored.

A tax strategy shouldn’t be something you set once and forget. It should evolve alongside your business. As project types change, new contracts are signed, and operational goals shift, your tax plan should adapt as well. The contractors who treat tax planning as an ongoing process are often better positioned to manage cash flow, pursue growth opportunities, and avoid surprises at year-end.

Construction Businesses Change. Your Tax Strategy Should Too.

Construction companies rarely look the same from one year to the next. A contractor that once focused primarily on residential work may expand into commercial construction. A company accustomed to handling shorter projects may begin taking on longer-term contracts. Others may experience rapid growth, enter new markets, or take on public-sector work.

Each of these changes can affect how revenue is recognized, when tax liabilities arise, and what planning opportunities may be available.

Consider a contractor who selected an accounting method years ago and never revisited it. While that method may have aligned with the company’s operations at the time, changes in project mix, contract duration, or payment patterns could make it far less effective today.

Without regular reviews, contractors may find themselves paying taxes sooner than necessary, missing opportunities to defer taxable income, or overlooking strategies that could improve working capital.

The goal of construction tax planning is not simply to reduce taxes. It’s to better align tax obligations with the realities of your business and keep more cash available for operations and growth.

New Opportunities for Residential Contractors

Recent changes under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act have expanded tax planning opportunities for many residential contractors, particularly through the broader availability of the completed contract method for qualifying residential construction projects.

Historically, a residential contractor using the percentage-of-completion method often had limited flexibility in how project income was recognized for tax purposes. Under the new rules, qualifying residential contractors may be able to elect a non-POC method for new residential projects, including the cash basis or completed contract method.

This creates opportunities to better align tax obligations with cash flow and project timing.

Cash Basis

Under the cash basis method, income generally is not recognized until payment is received, and expenses generally are not deducted until they are paid.

For some contractors, this creates valuable flexibility because taxable income more closely follows actual cash flow. This may allow certain contractors to defer recognition of income until payment is received, depending on their specific tax circumstances.

However, timing matters. An unexpected customer payment received late in the year can significantly affect taxable income. Contractors who successfully use the cash method typically maintain strong visibility into upcoming collections and communicate regularly with customers about payment schedules.

Understanding the differences between these methods is important, as each can impact the timing of taxable income and cash flow in very different ways.

Completed Contract

The completed contract method generally allows contractors to defer recognizing revenue and expenses until a project is substantially complete.

For businesses with longer project durations, this can create meaningful tax deferral opportunities. Delaying tax liability may improve cash flow and leave more capital available to support ongoing operations throughout the life of the project.

However, deferred taxes are not eliminated. They are simply postponed until the project is completed. Contractors should regularly evaluate future tax obligations and avoid treating deferred tax dollars as excess cash available for spending.

The right method depends on your specific operations, project pipeline, and business objectives. What works well for one contractor may not be the best fit for another.

Don’t Overlook the 10% Method

Contractors who remain on the percentage-of-completion method may still have access to a valuable and often-overlooked tax deferral opportunity: the 10% method.

This election allows contractors to defer recognizing gross profit on contracts that are less than 10% complete at year-end.

While the impact on a single project may seem modest, the combined effect across multiple projects can be substantial. For contractors with several contracts in the early stages of completion, the resulting deferral can preserve valuable working capital.

That capital can be reinvested into equipment, workforce development, bonding capacity, technology improvements, or future projects instead of being paid to the IRS earlier than necessary.

The key is identifying these opportunities before year-end. By reviewing project statuses throughout the year, contractors can make proactive decisions rather than scrambling during tax season.

Questions Every Contractor Should Be Asking

Effective tax planning starts with understanding your business, not filling out tax forms.

As your company evolves, consider asking the following questions:

  • Has our project mix changed over the past year?
  • Are we taking on larger or longer-duration contracts?
  • Have our payment cycles changed?
  • Do we have visibility into year-end cash receipts?
  • Are we planning equipment purchases before year-end?
  • Are there projects that may qualify for tax incentives or specialized deductions?
  • Have recent legislative changes created new planning opportunities?

If the answer to any of these questions is yes, your current tax strategy may no longer reflect the realities of your business.

Waiting until tax season often limits your options. Reviewing your tax position throughout the year can help uncover planning opportunities while there is still time to act.

Tax Planning as a Competitive Advantage

For construction companies, effective tax planning is ultimately a cash flow strategy.

The capital preserved through effective tax planning can be used to purchase equipment, strengthen bonding capacity, hire employees, invest in technology, or pursue new opportunities. Those resources can provide a meaningful competitive advantage in an industry where liquidity and flexibility often drive success.

The most effective construction tax strategies are not created once and left unchanged. They are reviewed regularly, adjusted as projects evolve, and aligned with the company’s broader goals.

How HTB Can Help

Construction tax planning works best when it’s proactive, not reactive. As projects, timelines, and business objectives evolve, your tax strategy should evolve with them. That’s why we work with contractors throughout the year to identify planning opportunities, evaluate accounting methods, and help ensure tax decisions support broader business goals.

Our construction professionals understand the unique challenges contractors face, from managing cash flow and bonding capacity to navigating revenue recognition and changing tax regulations. Whether you’re reviewing your current tax approach or evaluating new opportunities created by recent legislation, we’re here to help. Contact us today to start the conversation.

Contact HTB

/by

Section 179D Energy-Efficient Commercial Building Deduction: A Reminder for Projects Already Underway

Section 179D Energy-Efficient Commercial Building Deduction: A Reminder for Projects Already Underway

The June 30, 2026 deadline for Section 179D has come and gone. As a result, energy-efficient commercial building projects that begin construction after that date generally will not qualify for the deduction.

However, that does not mean the opportunity has disappeared for every project.

If construction began on or before June 30, 2026, a project may still be eligible for the Section 179D deduction, provided all applicable requirements are met. For businesses, building owners, designers, and organizations that have recently completed or are currently constructing commercial buildings, now is a good time to determine whether a benefit may still be available.

What Types of Projects May Qualify?

Section 179D is designed to encourage energy-efficient improvements in commercial buildings. While many taxpayers associate energy incentives with solar or renewable energy projects, Section 179D often applies to more common building upgrades that improve overall energy performance.

Potentially qualifying improvements may include:

  • Interior lighting systems, including LED conversions, lighting retrofits, and lighting controls
  • Heating, cooling, ventilation, and hot water systems, including certain HVAC upgrades and control systems
  • Building envelope improvements, such as qualifying upgrades to roofs, walls, windows, doors, and insulation

The deduction may be available for qualifying improvements made as part of new construction projects or renovations to existing commercial buildings. For projects currently under review, one of the most important considerations is whether construction began on or before June 30, 2026.

Understanding the Potential Tax Benefit

The amount of the Section 179D deduction depends on several factors, including the building’s energy savings and whether prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements are satisfied.

For taxable years beginning in 2026, the deduction generally ranges from:

  • $0.59 to $1.19 per square foot under the standard rules
  • $2.97 to $5.94 per square foot for projects that meet prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements

Because the deduction is calculated on a per-square-foot basis, the potential benefit can be significant. For example, a qualifying 100,000-square-foot building could generate a deduction of up to $119,000 under the standard maximum rate or as much as $594,000 under the enhanced rate.

Actual deduction amounts will vary based on the specific facts of the project, energy performance results, certification requirements, and other applicable limitations.

Documentation Matters

One of the most common misconceptions about Section 179D is that a taxpayer can simply determine that a building is energy efficient and claim the deduction.

In reality, Section 179D requires technical analysis and supporting documentation. Energy savings must generally be evaluated using approved methodologies, and the deduction requires certification from a qualified third party. Taxpayers claiming the deduction must also file Form 7205, Energy Efficient Commercial Buildings Deduction, with their tax return.

Given these requirements, maintaining complete project documentation is critical. Relevant records may include:

  • Construction-start documentation
  • Placed-in-service dates
  • Energy modeling reports or retrofit analyses
  • Third-party certification materials
  • Square footage calculations
  • Allocation documentation for qualifying tax-exempt building projects

Projects that may otherwise qualify can encounter challenges if supporting documentation is incomplete or unavailable.

Now Is the Time to Evaluate Existing Projects

With the construction-start deadline now behind us, the focus has shifted from planning future projects to identifying and preserving deductions tied to projects already underway before June 30, 2026.

Building owners, developers, architects, engineers, and organizations involved in commercial construction should consider whether their projects have been evaluated for Section 179D eligibility and whether the necessary documentation and certification requirements have been addressed.

At HTB, we help clients navigate complex tax incentives and identify opportunities that can support their overall tax strategy. Whether you’re evaluating a recently completed project, reviewing documentation requirements, or determining whether a project may qualify for the Section 179D deduction, our team can help you understand the rules and assess the next steps. Contact us today to start the conversation.

Contact HTB

/by

Financial Planning for Pre-Retirement: Preparing for the Transition

The pre-retirement years are a critical time to evaluate readiness, optimize financial strategies, and prepare for the next phase of life. Discover how a coordinated approach to retirement planning can help maximize opportunities, reduce surprises, and support long-term financial security.

Read more
/by

HTB Named to INSIDE Public Accounting’s Top 200 List

,

Hannis T. Bourgeois, LLP has once again been named one of the Top 200 Accounting Firms in the U.S. by INSIDE Public Accounting, recognizing the firm’s excellence and continued growth.

Read more
/by

IRS Increases Standard Mileage Rates for the Remainder of 2026

IRS Increases Standard Mileage Rates for the Remainder of 2026

The IRS increased the standard business mileage rate from 72.5 cents per mile to 76 cents per mile, effective July 1, 2026. The medical and moving mileage rate also increased from 20.5 cents per mile to 23.5 cents per mile, while the charitable mileage rate remains 14 cents per mile.

According to the IRS, the increases reflect recent changes in fuel prices and vehicle operating costs.

What This Means for Taxpayers

The higher rates may result in larger tax deductions and higher reimbursements for miles driven after July 1, 2026.

For business mileage:

  • January 1 – June 30, 2026: 72.5 cents per mile
  • July 1 – December 31, 2026: 76 cents per mile

Self-employed individuals who use the standard mileage method may be able to claim larger deductions for eligible business travel during the second half of the year. Employees who are reimbursed for business mileage may also receive higher reimbursements, depending on their employer’s policy.

Because the change took effect midyear, taxpayers must apply the correct mileage rate based on when the miles were driven. The charitable mileage rate did not change because it is set by federal law.

Don’t Overlook Recordkeeping

The higher mileage rates do not change the need for good documentation. Taxpayers should continue maintaining detailed mileage logs that generally include the date, destination, purpose, and number of miles driven for each trip.

Businesses that reimburse employees for the business use of personal vehicles may also want to review their mileage reimbursement policies and systems to ensure the updated rate was applied beginning July 1, 2026.

Reviewing mileage records now, rather than waiting until year-end, can help taxpayers claim the appropriate deduction and avoid errors when filing their returns.

Contact HTB

/by

Fund Balance Best Practices: Building Financial Resilience for Public Entities

Fund Balance Best Practices: Building Financial Resilience for Public Entities

For cities, parishes, school systems, and other public entities, fund balance is more than an accounting measure. It is a critical tool for maintaining financial stability and delivering services when unexpected challenges arise.

Whether facing a natural disaster, economic slowdown, delayed tax collections, or unexpected capital needs, organizations with a strong fund balance are better positioned to maintain operations without disrupting services or making rushed financial decisions.

The key is not simply accumulating reserves. It is maintaining the right amount of fund balance, supported by clear policies and a long-term financial strategy.

Why Fund Balance Matters

Fund balance represents the resources available to help a government manage financial uncertainty, maintain operations, and plan for future needs.

A healthy fund balance provides flexibility when revenues fall short of expectations and helps governments manage timing differences between collecting revenue and paying expenses. It also provides resources to respond to emergencies, reduces reliance on short-term borrowing, and can contribute to stronger bond ratings and lower borrowing costs. In many cases, a strong fund balance creates opportunities to fund future capital projects without taking on additional debt.

Without adequate reserves, even minor revenue fluctuations or unexpected expenditures can create significant budget challenges. Conversely, organizations with well-planned reserves are often better equipped to maintain service levels and make thoughtful financial decisions during periods of uncertainty.

Understanding Available Resources

One of the most common misconceptions about fund balance is that all reported balances are available to spend. In reality, some resources may be restricted by legal requirements, grant agreements, voter-approved measures, or formal actions of the governing body.

GASB Statement No. 54 established classifications that help governments identify the level of constraint placed on fund balance. Understanding these distinctions helps elected officials and administrators evaluate financial flexibility, make informed budgeting decisions, and avoid overestimating available resources.

How Much Fund Balance Is Enough?

One of the most common questions in governmental finance is how much fund balance should be maintained.

The answer depends on each entity’s unique circumstances. Governments with stable and predictable revenues may require smaller reserves than those that rely heavily on property taxes or other revenues collected at specific times during the year. Exposure to natural disasters, significant infrastructure needs, economic uncertainty, and other financial risks should also be considered when establishing fund balance targets.

Many governments establish minimum fund balance targets as a percentage of annual expenditures, but there is no universal standard that fits every organization. The goal is to maintain enough reserves to manage risk and support operations while ensuring resources remain available to meet community priorities.

Balancing Reserve Levels With Community Needs

While insufficient reserves create financial vulnerability, excessively large fund balances can also raise questions from taxpayers and stakeholders.

When reserve levels significantly exceed operational needs, governments should evaluate whether resources could be used to address deferred maintenance, fund capital improvements, reduce future borrowing needs, strengthen public services, or mitigate future tax and fee increases.

Fund balance should serve a purpose. The objective is to strike the right balance between preparedness and responsible stewardship of public resources.

Questions Every Public Entity Should Ask

Fund balance management should be reviewed regularly, not only during budget preparation or the annual audit. Leadership should periodically consider questions such as:

  • Does our current fund balance policy reflect today’s financial risks and economic conditions?
  • Could we continue providing essential services if revenues declined unexpectedly?
  • Are our reserve targets based on actual risks or simply historical practice?
  • Do we have a plan to replenish reserves if they are used?
  • Can we clearly explain our reserve levels and financial strategy to taxpayers and stakeholders?

Regularly evaluating these questions can help organizations identify gaps before financial challenges arise.

Establish a Formal Fund Balance Policy

One of the most effective steps a public entity can take is adopting a written fund balance policy.

A strong policy should:

  • Establish minimum and maximum fund balance targets.
  • Define the purpose of reserves.
  • Identify circumstances under which reserves may be used.
  • Outline how depleted reserves will be replenished.
  • Require periodic review and updates.

A formal policy promotes consistency, improves transparency, and provides decision-makers with a framework for navigating financial challenges.

Building Long-Term Financial Resilience

Fund balance management is most effective when it is integrated into broader financial planning. Public entities should regularly monitor fund balance levels, assess emerging risks, and evaluate whether reserve targets remain appropriate as operating conditions change.

Open communication with governing boards, elected officials, and the public is equally important. Transparent discussions about reserve levels and financial policies help build trust and reinforce confidence in the organization’s stewardship of public resources.

Key Takeaway

Strong fund balance management is a cornerstone of long-term financial health for public entities. By establishing clear policies, maintaining appropriate reserve levels, regularly assessing financial risks, and incorporating fund balance into ongoing planning efforts, governments can strengthen their ability to navigate uncertainty while continuing to serve their communities effectively.

How HTB Can Help

At HTB, our team works with public entities to evaluate fund balance levels, develop reserve policies, strengthen financial planning processes, and ensure compliance with governmental accounting standards. Whether your organization is establishing its first formal fund balance policy or reassessing existing reserve targets, our governmental services team can help develop practical strategies that support long-term financial stability, sound decision-making, and community trust.

Contact HTB

/by